🎯 Caitlin Clark Fans Are Now Being Called Racist — All Because They Criticized Angel Reese?

In what may be the most absurd twist yet in the ongoing narrative surrounding Angel Reese vs. Caitlin Clark, a new study from Rice University and the University of Illinois at Chicago has just labeled fans of Caitlin Clark as “racially biased.”

Yes, you read that right.

According to the study, criticizing a missed layup… questioning a bad shooting night… even disliking a taunting gesture — is now being reclassified as “colorblind racism.”

🧪 The Study That Thinks You’re the Problem

This so-called “data-driven” study analyzed over 700,000 tweets surrounding the 2023 NCAA Women’s Basketball Championship game between LSU and Iowa.

Their conclusion?

Caitlin Clark was “celebrated”
Angel Reese was “disproportionately criticized”
Therefore, it must be… racism.

The researchers argue that even subtle language — such as calling Reese “classless” for her taunt — is coded racial bias, because Clark did the same gesture first and wasn’t criticized as harshly.

“This is a real-time reflection of how race and gender shape public perception,” the study claims.

But let’s stop right there.

❌ Here’s Why That’s Nonsense

Let’s get real: criticism isn’t racism.

If fans can’t call out missed shots, poor sportsmanship, or questionable behavior — then what is sports commentary even for?

Plenty of white athletes have been labeled thugs, punks, showboats, or worse.
Does that mean those terms are “coded hate”? Or are we just… talking about the game?

The study calls this “colorblind racism,” a term so vague and flexible that any disagreement, dislike, or reaction can now be painted as racial bias — regardless of intent.

Newsflash: just because someone doesn’t like Angel Reese doesn’t mean it’s because of her race.
Maybe it’s because she plays dirty. Or talks trash. Or just isn’t their kind of player.

🤔 “If You Criticize Her, You’re a Racist”

That’s the new standard. That’s where we are now.

According to the authors, if you’re a Caitlin Clark fan from Iowa, Texas, Florida, or anywhere else — you’re now complicit in a larger system of “coded racial perception.”

Welcome to 2024: where opinions are illegal unless they’re approved.

📉 From Sports Debate to Victim Olympics

What started as a healthy rivalry between two college basketball stars has now been twisted into an ideological weapon.

Angel Reese isn’t just a competitor anymore — she’s been framed as a victim of systemic hate.

And anyone who questions that narrative?
Automatically branded as part of the problem.

The media isn’t covering basketball anymore. They’re covering feelings.
And if your feelings don’t match theirs — you’re labeled.

🎓 The Real Problem? Academia Gone Mad

This isn’t a sports issue anymore — it’s a symptom of a bigger crisis.

Universities are inventing new terms, twisting data, and weaponizing sociological theories to push ideological agendas. They’re training a generation not to think critically, but to censor disagreement under the guise of “justice.”

“Colorblind racism” is just the latest made-up term used to shut down opposing views.

They can’t argue on logic. So they scream “racist!”
They can’t win in ratings. So they scream “hate!”

⚠️ Final Thought: Don’t Let Them Shame You for Caring About the Game

If you support Caitlin Clark, or any other player — you’re allowed to be a fan. You’re allowed to criticize. You’re allowed to think for yourself.

You’re not a racist for liking good basketball.

You’re not a villain for wanting players to act with class.

And you’re definitely not the problem for questioning bad behavior on the court.

You’re a fan. And that’s exactly what this game needs.